The Burning Hour
The projector fan is whining, a high-pitched 68-decibel protest against the dust it’s inhaled for three years, and the blue light from the screen makes everyone in the room look like they’ve been underwater for several days. I am leaning back in a chair that has one squeaky wheel-specifically the back-left one-and I am watching Row 48 of a spreadsheet that has been projected onto the wall.
There are 8 managers in this room. If you calculate their average hourly rate, we are currently burning through roughly $888 every hour just to sit here and listen to someone read aloud words that are already written on the screen. It is a peculiar form of corporate penance, a ritual where the data is the deity and we are the reluctant congregants. We are here to ‘review,’ but what we are actually doing is performing a manual sync of information that should have been synchronized by a server 18 hours ago.
Friction vs. Flow
I tried to go to bed early last night, but the thought of this meeting kept buzzing in the back of my skull like a trapped moth. I knew exactly how it would go. We would start at 9:08 AM, someone would forget the HDMI adapter, and then we would spend the next 88 minutes moving through a list of 28 items, most of which haven’t changed since last Tuesday. The core frustration isn’t just the boredom; it’s the realization that we are using expensive human brains to perform the function of a simple API.
But in our corporate environment, we seem to thrive on friction. We have built these massive, lumbering processes where the ‘difficulty’ of getting a straight answer is so high that we eventually just give up and call a meeting. We mistake the exhaustion of the meeting for the satisfaction of work.
The Lizard Brain’s Ledger
This behavior reveals a deep-seated distrust of asynchronous information sharing. It’s a holdover from the pre-digital age, a time when ‘the ledger’ was a physical book and you had to walk to the warehouse to see if the crates were actually there.
We’ve replaced the physical crates with digital rows, but the lizard brain still doesn’t believe the row is ‘real’ unless Bob from logistics says it is real. We are looking for the verbal nod, the social proof that the data isn’t lying to us.
It’s a failure of trust in the tools we’ve built, and it’s a failure of the tools themselves for not being trustworthy enough to exist without us. If the system were truly alive, if it were updated in real-time with alerts that fired the moment a threshold was crossed, why would we need to sit here for 98 minutes?
The Ritual of Helplessness
I find myself wondering if we secretly love the waste. There is a strange comfort in the ritual. In a meeting, you don’t have to make hard decisions; you just have to ‘update.’ You can hide in the herd. If 8 people are looking at the same spreadsheet, no single person is responsible for the fact that the numbers haven’t moved in 18 weeks.
“We are all witnesses to a slow-motion disaster, and there is a bizarre camaraderie in that shared helplessness. We are all sinking, but at least we are sinking together in a climate-controlled room with mediocre coffee.
We are essentially acting as the manual refresh button for a system that was supposed to automate our lives. When you step back and look at the architecture of the modern office, you see these massive gaps where software should be. In those gaps, we throw human beings. We throw their time, their focus, and their creative energy into the void to bridge the distance between ‘Data Point A’ and ‘Decision Point B.’
The standard operating procedure for nearly half the companies interacted with.
Focusing on ‘Why’ and ‘How’
True collaboration happens when the data is already a given. It happens when the system handles the ‘what’ so that the humans can focus on the ‘why’ and the ‘how.’ If the dashboard is red, I shouldn’t need a meeting to tell me it’s red. I should already be working on the fix.
Spent debating alarm light color (G18)
VS
Solved instead, with clarity.
This is why platforms like cloud based factoring software are so vital; they are built on the premise that real-time reporting and automated alerts aren’t just features-they are the antidote to the ‘Tuesday Morning Performance.’ You stop using your managers as human tally sticks and start using them as leaders.
When the Server Went Down
I remember a project I worked on about 18 months ago. We had a similar recurring meeting. It was supposed to be a ‘quick sync,’ but it regularly ballooned into a two-hour ordeal. One day, the server went down, and we couldn’t access the spreadsheet.
“Well, I guess we can’t do the update.”
We all left. And you know what happened? Nothing. The company didn’t collapse.
That was the moment I realized the meeting wasn’t for the company; it was a security blanket for the management. We were afraid that if we stopped talking about the work, the work would stop happening. It’s a superstitious belief, like thinking that if you stop looking at the pot, it will never boil.
Cognitive Output Remaining (Post-Meeting)
12% Remaining
The System Problem
If you find yourself in a room looking at a projected spreadsheet more than once a week, you don’t have a communication problem; you have a system problem. You are trying to solve a technical deficiency with human bodies. It’s the equivalent of hiring 88 people to carry buckets of water to a fire instead of just installing a sprinkler system.
We need to have the courage to trust the systems we build, and more importantly, we need to build systems that are worth trusting. We’ve spent 78 minutes climbing that wall today, and we still haven’t seen the other side.
I’m going to go buy another coffee, maybe this time it’ll taste like something other than regret.
Comments are closed